Sunday, March 5, 2017

High School Confidential - Pretty in Pink and Footloose

After reading David Denby’s “High School. Confidential” I watched two different movies from the 80’s to see if they could relate since they are both “high school” movies. The two movies that I watched were “Pretty in Pink” and “Footloose”. While watching these movies, I was looking for something in particular: stereotypes in high school. Here’s what I found:

Related image

Just like “High School Confidential”, “Pretty in Pink” had the stereotypical outsider female: a girl who lost her mother, who is middle-class, doesn't follow fashion norms, who is awkward, and is an artist. This character would be Andie. They also had the mean girls that according to the reading were: blonde with big hair, usually flipped in a swirl, she's tall, she follows the fashion norm, she usually upper class, and rude. In “Pretty in Pink” this character would be Benny Hanson. Then the reading spoke about the stereotypical jock and defined him as a guy who is usually a football player, is the most attractive guy in school, pulls pranks, and doesn't do well in his classes. “Pretty in Pink” had a guy similar to that, minus the fact that he doesn't participate in sports, and he is Steff McKee. According to “High School Confidential”, the jock and the blonde are dating. This would be true in “Pretty in Pink” if Steff McKee was a jock, he's just a high-class male who parties, who is rude, who is a flirt, and doesn't care about a true relationship with a female. Then when Denby started talking about the outsider male, a guy who stutters or giggles a lot, the friend of the female outsider, has an undeveloped body, and is brilliant but preoccupied. Duckie from “Pretty in Pink” came to mind.
   Overall, this movie follows high school stereotypes even though it’s an old movie. For my school, high school stereotypes are close to/ nonexistent, I cannot speak for other schools, though. My school is also very small, so I think that it may be harder to distinguish an exact high school stereotype like the movie showed. The movie also tells you something about the filmmaker according to Denby. He said, “My guess is that these films arise from remembered hurts which then get recast in symbolic form.” So, in “Pretty in Pink” where Andie’s mother isn't present, the filmmaker probably had an absent mother as well, then made the movie with an artistic girl that has an absent mother become the girl that ends up getting the guy she wants and having a happy ending. To try to either make up for the filmmaker’s absent mother or maybe they just came up with a random plot and went along with what they wanted.

Image result for footloose gif

The second movie that I watched was “Footloose.” This movie was different because it didn't really show high school stereotypes. “Footloose” had the new guy from Chicago, Ren, that wanted to abolish the law against music and dancing. The main girl was the reverend’s daughter, Ariel Moore, who didn't want the other teenagers to think that she was the reverend’s daughter. In order to do that, she didn't act like the perfect angel Rev. Moore thought she was. She had a boyfriend, Chuck, who acted like the top dog. He wanted to challenge Ren to a game sort of like chicken but with the two boys driving tractors towards each other to see who will jump off first. The characters in this movie kind of resemble people today, but not completely. I say this in the sense that we have people that are the children of reverends or persists but the children act up the most, we have the teens that are very reckful and almost get into accidents that could kill themselves or other people, we have the teens that don't do anything but silently watch, and we have the ones that join the reckful ones but quit halfway through. For the movie relating to the filmmakers, at the moment, I cannot see how this movie can relate unless the filmmakers parents prohibited them from music and dancing when they were young.








9 comments:

  1. I loved how you described the stereotypes rather than just stating them. This showed you knew what you were talking about, supported what you were trying to prove, and informed anyone who read the post. Awesome job with that!

    However, I found that your sentence flow could be a bit choppy. I noticed it more so in the paragraph about "Pretty in Pink". With sentences like, "They also had the mean girls that according to the reading were: blonde with big hair, usually flipped in a swirl, she's tall, she follows the fashion norm, she usually upper class, and rude." Just a few awkward statements like going from the no "she" to added "she." And it should be with big blonde hair, just for a better flow.

    And there is one point that I definitely disagreed with, that our school doesn't have those stereotypes of groups as much as a big school does. I believe that our smaller population calls for even more of that. There is no outsiders or people with no group, everyone has conformed to a certain friend group. Although the mean girls don't have big blonde hair, they all wear the same brands, where the same makeup, and go after the same guys. Just by scanning the lunch room you can see that everyone has there set groups, and that there are stereotypes everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought this blog was very thoroughly written and I liked how you gave a brief explanation of each of these films, yet you could have explained what the films said about each filmmakers, along side the quotes that you put, instead of just leaving quotes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have to agree with Bri, the way you actually described the stereotypes rather than just stating them, like other have, adds a nice bit of personality to your post. If I would have not seen the movie Pretty in Pink, you would have given me a really good idea of what kinda characters I would have gotten to know.

    I'd like to mention though, if you say you're going to analyze both movies, I suggest you do so equally. You did a thorough job with the first one, but then just kinda glossed right on over Footloose. I understand the want to get two in comparison, but you barely went on over Footloose. When you talked about the stereotypes inside of Footloose, you said they were little to none. You have the new guy come into town from a small town and become the hero in the end and win over the innocent little girl. I've seen plenty of movies follow this before.

    As for your suggestion that these stereotypes don't exist, I'd have to say we do have them at MIA. Although they may not be prominent, and they don't show themselves right away. We do have our outcasts, our nerds, and our mean girls with plenty of room to spare.

    Because although we're tight knit, if you don't fit into one of our tight knit groups, then you're pretty much lost. I'd also like to comment on the fact that although you did say what these stereotypes mean in terms of evaluating them based on the filmmakers, you didn't expand on it. There was one sentence, which is good as an add on, but needed more. Almost as if it was an afterthought.

    Otherwise, I think the format of this blog is done very well, and your addition of the two gifs are done so tastefully. They just should be a little smaller I suggest so they don't take away from the actual post.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Get un-grounded. I really like how you took two movies instead of doing one. It was a creative take on the assignment and shows you did more than what was required of you. However, this seemed to be too ambitious. You weren't able to offer the proper deep analysis that I would expect.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Kayla!! I love you had explained not just one flick but also two films to write within your blog. Within you blog I feel like that you were very specific at addressing the stereotypes that were expressed within "pretty in pink" and "footloose" offering examples able the individual characters "stereotypical outsider girl...who is awkward .. this character would be andie" you had managed to explain a bit the stereotype and then show how it fits within the frame work the movie. If I had to give some criticism for blogpost would be that to go go a bit more into depth about the "what does it say about the filmmakers" in the sense if it reflects there secret desires. Even it was quickly mentioned and was addressed but if you went more into depth I feel like that you could have really proved your perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kayla, I think the movies you wrote about are very different from one another and I think that was a great way to approach this blog. I also like how you stated that you were only focusing on stereotypes in high school.
    While I like that you spoke on both movies, I feel like the time constraint kinda screwed you. I feel that you didn't entirely answer the prompt. You merely only summarized Footloose and vaguely addressed the plot when speaking about Pretty in Pink.

    P.S. Footloose is one of my favorite movies and I love that you wrote about it :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kayla, you really went into depth with the stereotypes of each movie and describing the characters. You demonstrated your opinion of stereotypes at our school being none and I do agree with you because I don't think there's ever that one girl that doesn't fit in and then wins over the popular guy. It just doesn't seem realistic in today's society. I do agree with Andrah that the analysis of your second movie was a bit rushed and not as good as your first. I did like your movie choices and the fact that you chose to approach this prompt using two sources. Good job.

    ReplyDelete
  8. All of the stereotypes were made very clear within the movie you watched but you couldve used more examples of them.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You stayed on topic well, but you could've gone in-depth much more on certain parts.

    ReplyDelete